Saturday, November 29, 2025

Long Way from Madison—Time to Rethink, Revise

Qualifications
Standards Enforcement 
Prerequisites for Public Office


We are a long way—carelessly and arrogantly distanced—
from Madison, Jay, Adams, Lincoln.

Federal Houses of Congress Past Tense

UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES


“The Constitution placed notably few hurdles between ordinary citizens and becoming a Member of the U.S. House of Representatives. The founders wanted the House to be the legislative chamber closest to the people—the least restrictive on age, citizenship, and the only federal office at the time subject to frequent popular election.

The Constitution requires Members of the US House of Representatives to have reached the age of twenty-five years; to have held United States citizenship for at least seven years, and to hold residency in the state they represent (though not necessarily the same district).

“…Article VI, clause 3 requires that all Members take an oath to support the Constitution before they exercise the duties of their office.
In Federalist 52, James Madison of Virginia wrote that, ‘Under these reasonable limitations, the door of this part of the federal government is open to merit of every description, whether native or adoptive, whether young or old, and without regard to poverty or wealth, or to any particular profession of religious faith.’” Source: Constitutional Qualifications https://history.House.gov/Institution/Origins-Development/Constitutional-Qualifications/

UNITED STATES SENATE


“Qualifications for the US Senate were more rigorous than those for the US House.” The Framers required Members of the Senate to have reached the age of thirty years; to have held United States citizenship for at least nine years; and, at the time of the election, to hold residency in the state in which they were elected (U.S. Const. art. I, § 3, cl. 2).
“The author of the Federalist No. 62 explained the difference in requirements for US Representatives and US Senators as arising from the nature of the senatorial trust, which, requiring greater extent of information and ability of character, requires at the same time that the senator should have reached a period of life most likely to supply these advantages; and which, participating immediately in transactions with foreign nations, ought to be exercised by none who are not thoroughly weaned from the prepossessions and habits incident to foreign birth and education” (The Federalist No. 62, Alexander Hamilton or James Madison). Source: Constitution Annotated: Analysis and Interpretation of the US Constitution https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/artI-S2-C2-1/ALDE_00013371/

H

owever, since, in the later eras—far past the care, earnestness and abilities of the founding revolutionaries (Adams and Jay), the 1700s constitutional framers (Madison and Jay), through the 1800s (Lincoln) commitment to preserving and strengthening the Union of colonies and states of America—the population, leadership and key figures of the United States are far less learned and literate and moral. Their whose exclusive self-interest is careless of America and its institutions. It seems that further requirements for the US House of Representatives and the US Senate are necessary. Substantive, strict and enforced requirements of intellect, morality, integrity, mental, physical and psychological stability and soundness; demonstrated professionalism and pertinent public- service experiential prerequisites are imperative to carrying out proper functions and affairs of government in matters foreign and domestic.


Present Tense


The emphasis on circulating finance, payola, pay-to-play, kickbacks, money laundering through dummy entities variously called foundations and not-for-profits and for-profits and nonprofits and non-governmental organizations, pandering to narrower and narrower interests have destroyed any semblance of Madison’s “closeness to the people,” any semblance of public service, stewardship or due diligence.

Americans might ponder these thoughts as Tennesseans approach a December 2, 2025, special election to fill a Seventh District US House of Representatives seat involving lead contenders Aftyn Alyssa Behn and Matthew Robert Van Epps.


Leading Candidates FEC Financials, General Reference Credentials

Total spent

Coverage dates: 07/01/2025 to 11/12/2025

                     

TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS: $708,891.98

 

OPERATING EXPENDITURES: $699,286.48

 

Total spent

Coverage dates: 04/01/2025 to 11/12/2025

 

TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS: $761,548.70

 

OPERATING EXPENDITURES: $757,293.70

 

Cash summary

Coverage dates: 07/01/2025 to 11/12/2025

 

ENDING CASH ON HAND: $521,737.18

DEBTS/LOANS OWED TO COMMITTEE: $0.00

DEBTS/LOANS OWED BY COMMITTEE: $19,943.76

 

Cash summary

Coverage dates: 04/01/2025 to 11/12/2025

 

ENDING CASH ON HAND:            $231,166.88

DEBTS/LOANS OWED TO COMMITTEE: $0.00

DEBTS/LOANS OWED BY COMMITTEE: $120,577.15

 

Financial Summary  Federal Election Commission (FEC) Data https://www.fec.gov/data/candidate/H6TN07195/

 

Financial Summary Federal Election Commission (FEC) Data https://www.fec.gov/data/candidate/H6TN07161/

 

 

 

Credentials – Public Service (Behn) Activist, Politician, Licensed Social Worker; Education: Graduate multiple degrees University of Texas at Austin (liberal arts, psychology; Steve Hicks School of Social Work MSW in administration and policy practice, Texas Center for Disability Studies portfolio certificate); Work: Tennessee Justice Center healthcare community organizer

Credentials – Public Service (Van Epps) Profession unclear; Education: graduate military academy degree in political science and mechanical engineering; Work: member US/Tennessee military/National Guard; staff TN State Dept of General Services & TN Governor’s office

















































Tennessee - House District 07

2026 | HOUSE https://www.fec.gov/data/elections/house/TN/07/2026/

Candidate Financial Totals

Candidate

Total receipts

Total disbursements

Cash on hand

Behn, Aftyn

$1,230,629.16

$708,891.98

$521,737.18

Van Epps, Matthew Robert

$992,715.58

$761,548.70

$231,166.88

Bulso, Gino

$757,062.34

$701,501.32

$55,561.02

Copeland, Darden Hunter

$587,799.79

$495,603.05

$100,580.82

Reeves, Lee Brian Mr. Jr.

$578,854.35

$550,388.04

$28,466.31

Foley, Mason

$405,548.00

$391,822.44

$13,725.56

Parks, Stewart Thomas

$362,209.68

$358,594.61

$3,615.07

Barrett, Joseph Michael

$316,907.49

$255,345.24

$61,562.25

Mitchell, James Bo

$228,777.25

$198,633.39

$30,143.86

Dixie, Vincent

$161,608.64

$145,924.05

$15,684.59


Candidate

Total receipts

Total disbursements

Cash on hand

Knight, Jason

$41,864.78

$36,093.06

$5,771.72

Cooper, Stuart

$35,150.32

$35,150.32

$0.00

Thorp, Jonathan

$12,319.22

$13,530.00

$0.00

Leurs, Joseph H

$6,608.08

$17,897.29

$0.00

Jones, David O. Jr.

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

Dagan, Adolph

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00



 https://www.fec.gov/data/elections/house/TN/07/2026/


Final Word 


For long, long time, we Americans in our words and deeds have been a long, long way from Madison. It is sacrilege to mention the founders and framers and their good work because we are ignorant of their substance and have no devotion to their work and improving upon the substance of their legacy. Our leaders, major media personalities and public figures are vulgar and lacking in honesty and integrity, deficient in discipline, emotional stability, intelligence and due diligence. America is hurting far deeper than image or optics. We are suffering. Our country and its institutions and its legacy of a Union of States (indivisible) is betrayed and arrogantly broken.  





###
Prolific Southern-Born American Writer Dr. Carolyn LaDelle Bennett focuses on People, Press, Politics USA; Domestic and Foreign Affairs (no copyright claimed in direct quotes and individual image)
https://www.facebook.com/carolynladelle.bennett
https://insightbeyondtodaysnews.blogspot.com/
Latest book: Are There No Champions? Yes and No
https://www.xlibris.com
Email: Nolandanisland@hotmail.com or Authorswork@gmail.com



Friday, November 14, 2025

Self-interested Power Deepening Vacuum in USA’s Public Good

Disconnect from the
Population
the Body Politic


If a person charged with government responsibilities is irresponsible; if focused entirely on image and posture on social and traditional media, on power, position and pandering to whatever (or whoever) applauds his antics or funds his position


Evidence 

Multi-Millionaire Members of US House and Senate (2024 update)


Rick Scott (Florida):

$327.35M

Vern Buchanan (Florida):

$249.36M

Nancy Pelosi (California):

$247.79M

Mitt Romney (Utah)

$245.34M

Darrell Issa (California):

$215.29M

 

Mark Warner (Virginia):

$195.20M

Daniel Goldman (New York):

$177.81M

Pete Ricketts (Nebraska):

$162.33M

Suzan Delbene Washington):

$125.61M

Don Beyer (Virginia):

$113.59M

 

Jay Obernolte (California):

$97.89M

 

Mark E. Green Tennessee):

$80.66M

 

David Trone (Maryland):

$77.41M

Kevin Hern (Oklahoma):

$76.91M

Roger Williams (Texas):

$75.30M

Sara Jacobs(California):

$73.03M

 

Markwayne Mullin (Oklahoma): $63.81M

John Rose (Tennessee):

$61.73M

Ralph Norman (South Carolina):

$60.10M

 

John Hoeven (North Carolina):

$59.61M

Scott Peters (California):

$55.93M

Bill Hagerty (Tennessee):

$55.73M

James E. Risch (Idaho):

$54.07M

Ron Johnson (Wisconsin):

$54.00M

Jamaal Bowman (New York):

$50.01M

 

Mitch McConnell (Kentucky):

$48.16M

Kathy Manning (North Carolina):

$47.97M

Dean Phillips (Minnesota):

$45.99M

Josh Gottheimer (New Jersey):

$45.96M

James Baird (Indiana):

$45.93M

 

Source: Spokesman Review Spokane, Washington, Further Review “Congressional Millionaires” “The Top 30” (chart) “the 30 richest people on Capitol Hill … as ranked by financial data aggregator Quiver Quantitative” by Charles Apple, October 2, 2024, https://www.spokesman.com/further-review/congressional-millionaires/


Evidence 

Multi-millionaire US Presidents (42nd thru– 46th-47th) before and after term in office (figures vary depending on source)


William Jefferson (var. Blythe III) Clinton [b. Hope, Arkansas] 42nd

US President

BEFORE:

$1.3M

AFTER (estimates vary):

$120–241M

 

George Walker Bush [b. New Haven, Connecticut] 43rd US President

BEFORE:

$20M 

AFTER:

$40M

 

Barack Hussein Obama II (once known in Indonesia as “Barry Soetoro”) [b. Honolulu, Hawaii] 44th US President

BEFORE:

$1.3M

AFTER:

$70M

 

Donald John Trump [b. New York, New York] 45th US President

BEFORE:

$2.3B

AFTER:

$3.7B

 

Joseph Robinette Biden Jr. [b. Scranton, Pennsylvania] 46th US President

BEFORE:

$8–9M

AFTER:

$10M

 

Donald John Trump [b. New York, New York] 47th US President

BEFORE:

$3.7B

LATER:

6.5B

 

Source: Smyth, Jenny October 26, 2025, “US Presidents Before and After Net Worth” (Updated 2025). 2025 Cine Net Worth https://www.cinenetworth.com/us-presidents-before-and-after-net-worth/ [Ranges & Variability: Data on Modern presidents such as Clinton and Trump “have wide-ranging estimates — reflecting divergent reporting across sources”] Cine Net Worth https://www.cinenetworth.com/about-us/


If a person charged with government responsibilities is irresponsible; if focused entirely on image and posture on social and traditional media, on power, position and pandering to whatever (or whoever) applauds his antics or funds his position


Evidence 

Waste, Fraud, Abuse


US Federal Budget Fiscal years 2001-2022

$8 TRILLION



US Wars (violent aggression against foreign countries) are “funded largely through debt” thus “obscuring the true costs of war by pushing financial obligations to future generations.” Past wars were funded “through increased taxes or the sale of war bonds.” Increased public debt drives up “interest rates economy-wide, which can hamper business investments and make life more expensive for individuals and families.”

Since early October 2023 $31.35 – $33.77 BILLION

 

Fiscal years 2025-2029 (House Resolution 1)

$156 BILLION for Pentagon and military related programs

 

Fiscal year 2026 Pentagon and military-related spending

13 percent increase over Fiscal year 2025

Pushes ‘national defense’ spending beyond $1 TRILLION mark

 Years 2020 through 2024

$771 BILLION in Pentagon contracts went to just five firms:

  1. Lockheed Martin ($313 billion)
  2. RTX (formerly Raytheon, $145 billion)
  3. Boeing ($115 billion)
  4. General Dynamics ($116 billion)
  5. Northrop Grumman ($81 billion)
Contrary Washington inmates and partners' round-the-clock propaganda about external threats to Americans (notice, they never mention the internal threats), the United States of America (via successive congresses and administrations) spends more than double the amount the People’s Republic of China spends on military spending, “even after accounting for differences in labor costs and purchasing power.” And though “Western strategists have a long tradition of over-inflating Russia as a military threat …, the Russian defense budget amounts to less than one-tenth of the US defense budget.”

Instructive COMPARISONS 

  • $8 Trillion Military Spending
  • $356 billion total diplomacy, development, and humanitarian aid budget (excluding military aid)
  • 5 jobs per $1 million U.S. military spending (incl direct jobs and jobs in private industry supply chain)
  • 13 jobs created for every $1 million US Education spending (nearly 3 times as much employment) Source: Cost of War Project Brown University (June 2025 page update) https://costsofwar.watson.brown.edu/costs/economic/us-federal-budget

If a person charged with government responsibilities is irresponsible; if focused entirely on image and posture on social and traditional media, on power, position and pandering to whatever (or whoever) applauds his antics or funds his position

Frivolity

Trump Administration Proposed Change of Cabinet Level Department of Defense to War Department

$2 Billion (2025 estimate)

Bahney, Jennifer Bowers September 5, 2025, “Trump’s Plan to Rename DOD to Department of War ‘Would Likely Cost Billions’: Report” Mediaite, https://www.mediaite.com/media/news/trumps-plan-to-rename-dod-to-department-of-war-would-likely-cost-billions-report/h-isnt-even-official-will-cost-2-billion/

Walker, Chris November 14, 2025, “Department of War” Name Change, Which Isn’t Even Official, Will Cost $2 Billion” “The move prioritizes ‘political theater over responsible governance,’ a group of Democrats said in a statement” Truthout https://truthout.org/articles/department-of-war-name-change-whic

Trump Administration Proposed Construction White House Golden Ballroom

$200–$300 million (2025 estimate)


Factually November 14, 2025 “Who is paying for the new ballroom at the White House?”
Checked on: “The White House’s new ballroom project—announced as privately financed and estimated at roughly $200–$300 million—has been funded by President Trump himself plus a long list of corporate and wealthy individual donors, including major tech, defense and finance firms; the White House released a donor list after initially saying fundraising would be private Reporting shows specific corporate names (Amazon, Apple, Google/Alphabet, Microsoft, Meta, Lockheed, Palantir and others) and individual donors (e.g., Stephen Schwarzman, Miriam Adelson, the Winklevosses).” “Exact dollar amounts per donor are often not disclosed and some contributions were reported as coming via settlements or intermediary entities.” https://factually.co/fact-checks/politics/who-is-paying-for-white-house-ballroom-57b9be


 

Ultimate Evidence 


Neglect of public Good



Evidence of Abandonment by Power
Public officials’ Priorities, Policies, and Practices:


Poverty in the United States of America


Compared with other Countries Around the World, the United States of America “has the highest poverty rate among the world’s 26 most developed countries.” [Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) data]

On a scale economists categorize as “‘relative child poverty,’” the United States of America “ranks second behind the United Mexican States (Mexico)” [United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) data]. Relative child poverty refers to a household in which “the income is less than half of the national median.”

The United States of America’s most poverty-stricken regions are those where US Federal officials’ policies offshored or otherwise destroyed the main source of domestic commerce and exchange, livelihood, income—agriculture, farming, raising livestock. States of the United States of America with the highest poverty rates (based on a three-year average, 2020-2022), highest percentage of population living below poverty line (states listed alphabetically) are:

Alabama 14.8 percent

 

Arkansas 15.9 percent

 

Kentucky 15.8 percent

 

Louisiana 16.9 percent

 

Mississippi 17.8 percent

 

New Mexico 18.2 percent

 

North Carolina and South Carolina tied each ast13.3 percent

 

Oklahoma 15.8 percent

 

Texas 13.7 percent

 

West Virginia 15.6 percent

 

Fay, Bill December 21, 2023 (update) “Poverty in the United States.” Debt.org. https://www.debt.org/faqs/americans-in-debt/poverty-united-states/
https://www.debt.org/



Home of the Nation’s Capital the Poverty Rates (2023 data) are these:

  • Throughout the District of Columbia 14.0 percent
· Among non-high school graduates: 34.3 percent
· Among Disabled Residents: 30.2 percent
· Among Residents with income below poverty line: 14.0 percent
· Among High school graduates: 9.8 percent
Source: City-Data.com https://www.city-data.com/poverty/poverty-Washington-District-of-Columbia.html


Drug Problem 


Not unrelated to poverty are problems of drug addiction and drug trafficking interwoven with unemployment and unemployability, essential schooling, marketable skills and training.

US States (including District of Columbia) with greatest (legal and illegal) Drug Addiction Problem (Ten States beginning with highest: #1- #10)


#1

New Mexico

#2
West Virginia

 

#3

Nevada

 

#4

Alaska

 

#5: Washington, DC

 

#6

Oklahoma

 

#7

Missouri

 

#8

Colorado

 

#9

Louisiana

 

#10

Arkansas

 


Source Kesslen, Ben May 13, 2025 “The 10 states with the biggest drug problems in America
Residents in some states are particularly struggling with substance use disorders” Quartz https://qz.com/us-states-by-drug-addiction-1851779223#the-10-states-with-the-biggest-drug-problems-in-america
About Quartz: https://qz.com/about


 Questions of Causation and Interwoven factors and conditions

 Though there are few easily available studies correlating substantive work with drug problems (addiction and trafficking or dealing), there have been some studies that have published findings showing a decisive link between unemployment or unemployability and drug trafficking or drug dealing. In a 2019 study, authors Kayode Emmanuel Adeniyi, Rosemary Eneji, and John Okpa made the following conclusion:

 “There was a highly significant direct relationship between lack of employability skills and drug trafficking, which suggests that “in the face of an increasing unemployment rate, job seekers who lack employability skills easily go into trafficking in illicit drugs for survival.” Moreover, “There was a significant association between lack of entrepreneurial skills and drug trafficking, suggesting that job seekers who lack entrepreneurial skills are more prone to trade in illicit drugs as a means of sustaining themselves from the pains of hardship. They are often recruited as agents, couriers, traffickers and peddlers by drug barons.”

Adeniyi, Emmanuel Kayode and Rosemary I. Eneji, John Thompson Okpa 2019 “Unemployment and Drug Trafficking Among Suspects in Custody of the National Drug Law Enforcement Agency, Cross River State Command, Nigeria” National Drug Law Enforcement Agency, University of Calabar, Calabar, Nigeria Doi:10.19044/esj.2019.v15n19p191 URL:http://dx.doi.org/10.19044/esj.2019.v15n19p191
https://files.core.ac.uk/download/pdf/236412431.pdf


Other studies by sources outside the United States of America have published similar findings.

Though the relationship between poverty and crime (including drug abuse and trafficking) is complex, studies have shown that poverty and unemployment are major contributing factors to drug trafficking. In some cases, individuals turn to drug trafficking as a means of survival when they are unable to find legitimate employment. It has been estimated that 10 to 15 percent “of all drug trafficking is motivated by poverty and unemployment.”
Human problems tend to feed on themselves and conditions become cyclical. “Without the knowledge and skills required for well-compensated work in the modern workplace, each succeeding generation of undereducated adults merely replaces the one before it without achieving any upward mobility or escape from poverty.” People having more advanced education have a greater chance of “achieving a secure economic future.” People who are “impoverished … tend to have less education, more health problems, less access to nutritionally adequate food;” and they “are more likely to live in high-crime areas.”

Contributing to the cycle of impoverishment and drug problems (abuse and trafficking) are demand, politics, gang activity, and addiction. The want for the last often results in trafficking. The cycle of addiction and trafficking is a significant issue: “addiction to drugs can lead individuals to traffic drugs to support their habits.”
Drug trafficking is also driven by high demand. Reports have shown that in the United States of America there is “a strong market for traffickers” with an estimated “16 million people” having “used cocaine in their lifetime.” “High demand for illicit drugs drives trafficking networks.” Another factor driving drug trafficking is the quality or caliber of governance. Corrupt officials—while often making a show of conducting drug raids or launching wars on drugs—tend to exacerbate the issue by habitually “allowing traffickers to bypass legal constraints and evade law enforcement.”
In the complex mix of trafficking and social conditions and corrupt governance is gang activity, which may also be a function of inadequate support and work or substantive employment.

As gangs, reportedly, use drug trafficking as a primary source of income, they also commit “violence and intimidation” (not unlike the USA’s entrenched mob element, its hegemonic culture and character of entitlement) to gain, maintain and control territories; and obtain, sustain and increase profits. As estimated “5 to 10 percent of drug trafficking” has been traced to “gang-related activity.” Particularly in the United States of America, drug trafficking “contributes to violent crimes.” Historical data, extending to the late 1990s, have shown an estimated 5 percent of murders in the United States are related to the drug trade. Source JOUAV Blog July 25, 2024, “Drug Trafficking: Definition, Types, and Causes”
Category: blog JOUAV 3A-11F, Jingrong Innovation Hub, No.200, 5th TianFu St., Hi-tech District, Chengdu City, China 610041 Stock Code: [ 688070.SH, https://www.jouav.com/blog/drug-trafficking.html
https://www.jouav.com/company


If a person charged with government responsibilities is irresponsible; if focused entirely on image and posture on social and traditional media, on power, position and pandering to whatever (or whoever) applauds his antics or funds his position—this person has no space or time to devote to the public good. Such an individual is totally ignorant of and divorced from public need and public good; what is vital to the strength of a nation. The priorities and actions of such a person amount to betrayal—betrayal dangerously lacking even in self-reflection. 


W

ithout leadership imbued with high moral character and intellectual caliber, we are lost. 

Without focused, reflective, serious and sustained due diligence in governmental leadership (and without a collective population holding them to task), whole societies, domestic and international, will continue to be subjected to needless harm and neglect.

Absent the aforementioned leadership qualities, a nation is bereft of essential good governance— governance in service to the public good. A nation is weakened (threatened from within) by weakness at the helm. Moral and intellectual weakness at the helm (in one after another US congress and administration) has inflicted perhaps irreparable harm on the nation’s people and the prospect of deepening and reinforcing a non-factional, indivisible Union, and shared culture.

  



###

Prolific Southern-Born American Writer Dr. Carolyn LaDelle Bennett focuses on People, Press, Politics USA; Domestic and Foreign Affairs (no copyright claimed in direct quotes and individual image)
https://www.facebook.com/carolynladelle.bennett
https://insightbeyondtodaysnews.blogspot.com/
Latest book: Are There No Champions? Yes and No
https://www.xlibris.com
Email: Nolandanisland@hotmail.com or Authorswork@gmail.com

Long Way from Madison—Time to Rethink, Revise

Qualifications Standards Enforcement  Prerequisites for Public Office We are a long way—carelessly and arrogantly distanced— from Madison, ...