O’Hara concludes:
“
|
Rather than striking a position based on the impact a
decision might have on the power and coffers of a particular party, we should
learn to focus on the facts of the case and leverage them to eliminate the
undue influence that money has on our elections. If we do, we might even return POWER TO THE
PEOPLE.” [My caps]
And, by the by, for you anti-Ruskie/everything “Russia/Putin
did it”, O’Hara writers this.
“
|
…for those who are concerned with Russian ‘interference’
[which never happened] in our elections, let me assure you that corporate and
union interference poses a far greater threat.
The reality is that countries (including the United States)
have historically tried to influence the elections of other countries. They
simply haven’t been as effective at ‘buying’ results AS HAVE OUR CORPORATIONS
AND UNIONS.” [My caps]
“
|
In Janus, the Court held that, “The First Amendment, made
applicable to the States by the Fourteenth Amendment, forbids abridgment of the
freedom of speech… (and) freedom of speech ‘includes both the right to speak
freely and the right to refrain from speaking at all.’”
The flaw in “Citizens
United is that it essentially confers individual status on corporations and
unions.… Janus argues against this.”
Sources
Independent
Voter Network June 27, 2018 “SCOTUS Renders Its Own ‘State of the Union’ in
Janus Decision” post by T. J. O’Hara in Civil Rights https://ivn.us/2018/06/27/scotus-renders-state-union-janus-decision/
Independent
Voter Network’s principal political analyst, T.J. O'Hara, is profiled as “an
internationally recognized author, speaker,” public and private sector “strategic
consultant,” and politician, O’Hara’s satire includes a political trilogy, “‘The
Left isn’t Right – The Right is Wrong - and The National Platform of Common
Sense.’” https://ivn.us/author/tjohara/
Cases
referenced
·
JANUS v. AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE, COUNTY,
AND MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES, COUNCIL 31, ET AL. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 16–1466. Argued February 26,
2018—Decided June 27, 2018 https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/17pdf/16-1466_2b3j.pdf
·
CITIZENS UNITED v. FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION APPEAL
FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA No. 08–205.
Argued March 24, 2009—Reargued September 9, 2009–– Decided January 21, 2010 https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/09pdf/08-205.pdf
My inserted caps and brackets.
Insight Beyond Today’s News, CLB
No comments:
Post a Comment