“Final Truth” excerpt, minor edit
“… [H]ere we have it at last, the final truth of Russia-gate:
There was indeed foreign collusion in the 2016 (U.S.) election but it came from the opposite direction than the media are telling us.
We weren’t attacked by Russia:
A few thousand dollars in Facebook ads that nobody saw did not put Trump in the White House.
Our democratic process was undermined, not by the supposedly omnipotent Vladimir Putin but by the intelligence agencies of some of our more beloved ‘allies.’
We were attacked by a tag team, both foreign and domestic, intent on
ousting a democratically-elected President by any means necessary.”
A
|
n America reduced to “a prisoner of history”—
Succumbed to relentless “lobbying and aggressive interventions” by and
for “ungrateful and spiteful ‘allies’ whose welfare states could not exist
without generous US ‘defense’ subsidies.…
America is no longer entitled to write (its own) history” (emphasis added)
Conspiracy to overthrow a sitting US President extends far beyond” a
U.S. domestic “‘Deep State.’…”
U.S. President Donald Trump’s decision to walk back his announcement to declassify “key Russia-gate intelligence… tells us that public knowledge of the contents would constitute a major break in relations with at least one key ally.”
The entire episode has Her Majesty’s (Britain’s) Secret Service’s fingerprints all over it.”
P
|
owerfully intermingled allegiances harnessed to the status quo “cannot allow
a U.S. head of state to threaten their “subsidies, subventions, and special
privileges” or attempt to “demolish the whole decrepit, dated, and dangerous
cold war architecture.”
That is “the essence of the fight,” Justin Raimondo writes, “the issue
that will determine the woof and warp of American politics in the new
millennium.
The final outcome is uncertain but what is certain is that “The Global Establishment has risen up against the People.”
I
|
am always interested in who pens a ring of truth. Here’s a brief bio on the author of the article “The Final
Truth of Russia-gate.”
Justin Raimondo is a native of affluent suburban Westchester County, city
of White Plains (town of Yorktown Heights, New York, 25 miles north of New York
City, Midtown Manhattan.
He has been associated with ideas and political philosophies of libertarians,
paleoconservatives (whose ideas combine “conservative cultural values and
social philosophy with a libertarian opposition to government intervention”), Libertarian
Republicans, and Ayn Rand’s objectivism (“a significant influence among
libertarians and American conservatives,” a philosophy described by Rand as “the
concept of man as a heroic being, with his own happiness as the moral purpose
of his life, with productive achievement as his noblest activity, and reason as
his only absolute.”
In addition to being founder and editorial director of Antiwar.com (a libertarian website self-described as being “devoted to ‘non-interventionism’ and opposing imperialism and war), Raimondo is author of several books including:
The Terror Enigma: 9/11 and the Israeli Connection (2003); An Enemy of the State: The Life of Murray N. Rothbard (2000); Into the Bosnian Quagmire: The Case Against U.S. Intervention in the Balkans (1996); Colin Powell and the Power Elite (1996); Reclaiming the American Right: The Lost Legacy of the Conservative Movement (1996, reissued 2008).
Sources
Strategic Culture Foundation website “The Final Truth of Russia-gate: As
the hoax unravels, the real story of ‘foreign collusion’ comes out” Justin
Raimondo October 10, 2018
https://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2018/10/10/final-truth-of-russia-gate.html
Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Justin_Raimondo
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Objectivism_(Ayn_Rand)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paleolibertarianism
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libertarianism
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antiwar.com
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yorktown_Heights,_New_York
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_Plains,_New_York
Political philosophies
Conservatism is described as
a political and social philosophy that promotes “traditional social institutions
in the context of culture and civilization.” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conservatism
Social conservatism is described
as a “belief that society is built upon a fragile network of relationships
which need to be upheld through duty, traditional values and established
institutions.” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_conservatism
Cultural conservatism is
described as being concerned with “the preservation of the heritage of one
nation, or of a shared culture that is not defined by national boundaries.” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cultural_conservatism
Insight Beyond Today’s News, CLB - © All Rights
Reserved
No comments:
Post a Comment