Showing posts with label London Breed. Show all posts
Showing posts with label London Breed. Show all posts

Saturday, March 7, 2020

Public Problems require Civil Service Solutions not Parochial Profiteering

Wiener’s “SB 899” panders with band aids, blurs church-state separation, fails to proffer public-interest solutions

Quick fixes conceived under pressure of crisis (and compounded crises) made not by inadequacy of the entity or institution of government — but by the impenetrable corruption, nepotism, incompetence, carelessness, and neglect of men and women ensconced in and around public office over many years.

Alternatives which are narrow-minded, shortsighted “nongovernmental” (anti-“bureaucracy,” anti-“government”), which amass wealth masked as doing good, which cash in and drain the public treasury (as surely as the military industrial complex) never aid public health and welfare. 
 
More often than not, as with Wiener's proposal, they selfishly
(a) breach the crucial barrier, in place to avert conflict and tribalism, which separates sectarianism from civil service (State)
(b) undermine essential, duly-designated public sector issues and priorities; and 
(c) further destroy public taxes-funded (and mandated) competent civil service for the general public health and welfare.
P
oliticians’ Pandering Never Solves Problems 

Duke University graduate, Fulbright Scholar, Harvard Law graduate Scott Wiener was born in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, grew up in southern New Jersey, and worked as a litigator for the bankrupt multinational Limited Liability Partnership Heller Ehrman White & McAuliffe headquartered in San Francisco, California.
  • In 2008, his former firm “filed a voluntary petition for chapter 11 bankruptcy for protection in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of California” throwing the firm into chaos over who was “entitled to revenue from client matters pending at the time of bankruptcy.” In 2016, the dispute reached the California Supreme Court.
  • In November 2016 Scott Wiener became a state senator for California’s District 11.
  • Estimated daily homelessness (2019) in Wiener’s old and later states of residency
Pennsylvania: 13,199
New Jersey: 8,862
California: 151,278
  • Public school student homelessness conditions school year 2017-2018
Pennsylvania: 440 students unsheltered, 6,681 in shelters, 2,231 in hotels/motels, and 21,901 doubled up.
New Jersey: 76 unsheltered, 1,982 in shelters, 1,511 in hotels/motels, and 9,665 doubled up
California: 10,407 unsheltered, 17,299 in shelters, 13,713 in hotels/motels, and 221,639 doubled up.
March 2020
S
an Francisco State Senator Scott Wiener introduces “SB 899 to allow faith institutions (such as churches, synagogues, and mosques) along with nonprofit hospitals to build affordable housing on their property by right, even if local zoning prohibits this type of housing.”

Wiener’s stated Rationale for his quick fix
  • Because: “Churches and other religious and charitable institutions often have land to spare, and they should be able to use that land to build affordable housing and thus further their mission.”
  • Because: “California desperately needs housing of all kinds, including affordable housing for ‘our’ low income residents.”

N
ONSENSE!

Contrary to the state senator’s enthusiasm for further breaching of the time-honored doctrine of separation of church and state, the government should not be in the business of helping sectarians further their “mission.” Their “mission” is their issue.

Nevertheless… sheep follow

California State Assembly (15th Assembly District) Hillary’ite Buffy Jo Christina Wicks:
“The State needs to consider all options for alleviating our [it is disgusting how politicians and media personalities incessantly and insincerely use the first person plural possessive "our"] housing crisis, and removing roadblocks for the faith community is a critical step in the right direction.”
Ethically compromised San Francisco Mayor London Breed:
“Our housing shortage is the result of decades of under building and restrictive zoning, and as a result, the cost of housing in San Francisco is unaffordable for many of our residents. We need solutions to eliminate the red tape that gets in the way of creating more affordable homes in our city.”
Breed’s get-government (unelected-bureaucrats) -off-our-backs reasoning” is ideologically scripted and fatally flawed. Her facts only minimally true. 

San Francisco is a big place with many buildings. And every municipality in the country has, one expects, properly thought out zoning laws.

In serious terms of permanent priorities and principled policies, politicians— as always, operating from crisis to crisis and election to election — fail to address critical issues in the public interest and for the long term.

C
ritical issues crafty politicians omit
  • Inferior education and training
  • Inadequate transferable skills
  • Uneasy or impossible access to mental health and referral services and more general human resources
  • Lack of or insufficient innovative workplaces planned and designed to replace incursion of automation
  • Under- and unemployment
  • Work and income insufficiency to cover costs of housing and related necessities
  • Wherewithal overall (mentally and physically) to stave off homelessness
People don’t need churches or other profiteers calling themselves non-profits.
People do not need others' guilt or alms or "do-gooding" "missions" or 
condescending, self-serving “charity.”
People don't need proselytizing
 People need strengthening resources permanently enabling self-sufficiency and independence.

Why not for public good instead of mere private gain employ the principle of —

E
minent Domain

As to the specific area of affordable housing, eminent domain is the better public course for the public good.

It lacks hidden motives and /or government laundering public money through private sectarian “nonprofit” enterprises, or private sectarian “nonprofits” laundering money through government. 

It is a traditional public instrument that avoids breaching important public doctrines such as the separation of church and state.

The law of eminent domain (land acquisition, compulsory purchase) means the State, Province or National Government is empowered “to take private property for public use.”
To serve the general public, the federal legislature, acting on behalf of the general public, could declare excess properties held by religious places or spaces (churches, synagogues, mosques, temples, etc., shouldn't object since they are such do-gooders) for public use; and make a one-time “just compensation” to the owners.



Sources

United States Interagency Council on Homelessness
“New Jersey Homelessness Statistics” https://www.usich.gov/homelessness-statistics/nj
“Pennsylvania Homelessness Statistics” https://www.usich.gov/homelessness-statistics/paa
“California Homelessness Statistics” https://www.usich.gov/homelessness-statistics/ca

https://sd11.senate.ca.gov/news/20200306-senator-wiener-introduces-housing-legislation-allow-churches-and-other-charitable
https://sd11.senate.ca.gov/biography
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scott_Wiener
Eminent domain https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eminent_domain#United_States

Curbed San Francisco “New bill would allow churches and hospitals to build housing on their land: Faith can be your shelter, but it probably shouldn’t be the only one” Adam Brinklow
March 6, 2020 https://sf.curbed.com/2020/3/6/21168455/wiener-church-affordable-housing-sb-899-bay-area

Curbed reports on “homes, streets, neighborhoods, and cities as inextricably related” (and brings) “local issues to a broad, national audience.”  https://www.curbed.com/pages/about-curbed

London Breed https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/London_Breed
Buffy Wicks https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buffy_Wicks

Other supporters of Wiener in their own narrow interests:
Non-Profit Housing Association of Northern California Executive Director Amie Fishman
Nonprofit Housing Association of Southern California Executive Director Alan Greenlee
https://sd11.senate.ca.gov/news/20200306-senator-wiener-introduces-housing-legislation-allow-churches-and-other-charitable


Insight Beyond Today’s News, CLB - © All Rights Reserved



Wednesday, February 26, 2020

Response to Pervasive Homelessness: Neglect and Force

Response to Zero Coronavirus infection: Staged “State of Emergency”

San Francisco fathers and mothers have for decades presided over a crisis and failed to fix it.

A United Nations Special Rapporteur in 2018 visited and interviewed residents in San Francisco’s homeless camps and compared conditions with “those of Mumbai” (Bombay), India, where billionaires in 2008 “had the highest average wealth of any city in the world. 

After New York City (103) and Hong Kong (93), San Francisco ranks third (74) in the number of billionaires (latest update Business Insider / Wikipedia).
By any measures, the United States as a whole and the city of San Francisco are “rich”; but “the deplorable conditions” allowed by government in San Francisco, are “by international human rights standards …, unacceptable,” said the UN Rapporteur.
And the various remedies employed by changing city officials have treated homeless people with contempt, “like nonentities.” The conditions and remedies were described as “horrible,” “undignified,” “illogical,” and “tragic.”
The picture of San Francisco’s homelessness presents permanent conditions, open to the world, of drug syringes, trash, and feces on streets — a level of contamination that reportedly exceeds that of “communities in Brazil (South America), Kenya (East Africa), or India” (South Asia).

Instead of housing the homeless, San Francisco, alternatively, turns to activism to preserve the state of homelessness (and camps), or violent sweeps to remove unsightly homelessness. The city fathers and mothers choose to hand out needles and issue lucrative contracts to their friends (basically maintaining squalor and dependency) to remove needles (if found) and feces from public view.

The estimated number of people in poverty in “the San Francisco Bay Area grew from 573,333 (8.6 percent) in 2000 to 668,876 (9.7 percent) in 2006-2010.”  A minimum-wage worker in San Francisco “would have to work approximately 4.7 full-time jobs to be able to rent a two-bedroom apartment.”

Homelessness may be caused by and may manifest a complex cycle of illnesses (physical and mental), that worsens when there is no access to treatment or healthy community, and one is unable to handle day to day chores and challenges. Homeless people are vulnerable to (at the mercy of) feckless politicians and profit-making “do-gooders”; predators and other physical and psychosocial threats which compound troubling mental and physical conditions.

Homelessness in the United States and in San Francisco (among other major cities, not to mention conditions in rural America) emerged as a prevalent condition in the late 1970s and early 1980s’ deindustrialization without alternative planning by competent and caring leadership  (similar today rapid pace of workplace automation and leaders’ failure see the scope of the problem and plan ahead) in the United States.

Change without Thought or Care
Deindustrialization, Negligence, Force  

Regional deindustrialization (New England to Great Lakes, 1979-1984); second wave deinstitutionalization (1970s following 1950s’ first wave); and the 21st century’s further deindustrialization and job losses, population shifts and investment alternations (2001-2009).

Since the (1929-1930s) Great Depression’s devastating epidemic of poverty, hunger, and homelessness, millions of people have migrated across the United States in search of work and housing.

In San Francisco in the 1980s, wages stagnated, funding for welfare reform decreased, the social safety net for underserved communities disappeared, and the number of people without homes increased.

San Francisco officials clamped down with zoning laws and redlining, “depriving certain neighborhoods of essential resources such as housing, schools, clinics, and grocery stores”; creating divisions within San Francisco districts; widening the income inequality gap; and polarizing resource accessibility and socioeconomic demographics. A critical consequence is today’s high rates of homelessness.

San Francisco’s “Model” Leadership better not replicated
  • Dianne Feinstein years (1978-1988): open temporary shelters and handed out “a sandwich and a bed for a night”
  • Arthur Christ Agnos (b. Arthouros Agnos) (1988-1992) for the homeless constructed “two” multi-service buildings for housing, mental health counseling and substance abuse assistance
  • Frank Jordan (1992-1996): imposed police and law enforcement power against the homeless and homelessness activists, issuing criminal citations; using police officers accompanied by social service workers to systematically sweep city blocks, engage homeless communities and dismantle homeless encampments
  • Willie Brown (1996-2004): ratcheted up the force with his “militarized clearance of the homeless encampments” and police citations to the homeless from Jordan’s high of 11,000 to more than double that number, rising to 23,000
  • Gavin Newsom (2004-2010 before becoming California’s governor) played both “good cop” “bad cop” roles: a little cash to house a few hundred homeless people some shuttled substance-abuse or mental health centers coupled with panhandling citations.
Treatable conditions and diseases untreated affect individuals and society at large  
  • Hunger
  • Mental disorders (wide ranging)
  • Skin disorders
  • Dental disease
  • Parasitic infections
  • Venereal disease
  • Hepatitis due                                                     
Contempt prevails. In San Francisco today, a “sit-lie law” (Section 168 of its Police Code) criminalizes homelessness by making it “unlawful to sit or lie down on a public sidewalk” between the hours of 7 a.m. and 11 p.m.
  • Ed Lee 43rd Mayor of San Francisco (January 11, 2011 – December 12, 2017)
  • Mark E. Farrell (appointed) 44th Mayor of San Francisco (January 23-July 11, 2018)
  • London Nicole Breed 45th Mayor of San Francisco (July 11, 2018 - ); acting mayor (December 12, 2017 – January 23, 2018); President of the San Francisco Board of Supervisors (January 8, 2015 – June 26, 2018); Member of the San Francisco Board of Supervisors (January 8, 2013 – July 11, 2018)
Yesterday’s News: Amidst persisting conditions of homelessness and no coronavirus cases diagnosed, San Francisco Mayor London Breed declare a “coronavirus” “state of emergency”

The Chronicle writer writes “Amid intensifying worldwide concern about the spread of the new coronavirus, Mayor London Breed declared a state of emergency for San Francisco Tuesday, which will ramp up the city’s efforts to prepare for and confront potential cases.”


Sources

Wikipedia
List of cities by number of billionaires https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_cities_by_number_of_billionaires
Homelessness in the San Francisco Bay Area https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homelessness_in_the_San_Francisco_Bay_Area
Deinstitutionalization https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deinstitutionalisation#United_States
Deindustrialization https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deindustrialisation_by_country#United_States

San Francisco Chronicle In “SF Mayor London Breed declares state of emergency over coronavirus” Dominic Fracassa February 25, 2020 https://www.sfchronicle.com/bayarea/article/SF-mayor-London-Breed-declares-state-of-emergency-15083811.php




Insight Beyond Today’s News, CLB - © All Rights Reserved




Long Way from Madison—Time to Rethink, Revise

Qualifications Standards Enforcement  Prerequisites for Public Office We are a long way—carelessly and arrogantly distanced— from Madison, ...