Showing posts with label US politics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label US politics. Show all posts

Tuesday, October 11, 2022

Former Congresswoman Breaks with Destructionists

Warns of Reigning Extremists set on Destroying from within and without

“I love our country.

“Our God-given rights of freedom, life, and liberty enshrined in our Constitution and Bill of Rights are my inspiration.”

 

Conscience, Cause of Action (charges)

W

ar Machine, Perpetual Aggression

 Today’s Democratic Party led by warmongers firmly in the grips of the military industrial complex and recklessly leading America and the world to the brink of nuclear war lacks care or concern about the consequences—costs of war, and who pays the price. 

L

awlessness: disavowal of institutions of justice, societal order and proper discipline The Party in exclusive service to its “partisan political ambitions” has repeatedly

  • · “Weaponized the security state and Federal law enforcement”
  • · Arrogantly demeaned “people of faith and spirituality”
  • · Created hostile presence against police while excusing crooks
  • · Demonized and dismissed the United States’ highest court (the US justice system and justices  also the International Criminal Court) as “illegitimate.”

S

uppression: a Neo-McCarthyism

The Party in its weakness, cowardice, and peculiar practice of public-private partnering—working “hand-in-glove with corporate for-profit media and Big Tech to smear and silence political opponents and those who dare to challenge their authority—demonstrates its contempt for Americans and for protected freedoms (particularly of speech) enshrined in the Constitution of the United States of America.

The Party “ideology … of hate and divisiveness” exposes their disavowal of principles associated with a “traditional liberalism”— principles such as “the basic goodness of people, the autonomy of the individual; support of civil liberties, and government of, by, and for the people.”

 

At her website posting, Tulsi Gabbard says

“I’ve dedicated my entire adult life to serving our country. What I care about is the truth and what’s right. I don’t fit into any box, and you’ll find me hard to label. I have a simple message: let’s do what’s best for the American people, our country, and the planet.” (Emphasis added)

“I love our country. Our God-given rights of freedom, life, and liberty enshrined in our Constitution and Bill of Rights are my inspiration. I answered the call to duty and took an oath, dedicating my life to supporting and defending those freedoms, both in uniform and in public office.”

Biographical sources show Tulsi Gabbard’s nineteen years of US Military Service (continuing) which have included deployments to Africa and Western Asia; the rank of Lieutenant Colonel, awards to include “Combat Medical Badge,” and “Meritorious Service Medal.”

Her Civilian Service includes

  • Member of the Hawaii State House of Representatives (2002-2004)
  • Legislative Aide to US Senator (Chairman of the Senate Veterans Affairs Committee) Daniel Kahikina Akaka of Hawaii (2010-2012)
  • Member of the City Council of Honolulu, Hawaii (2010-2012)
  • Member of the Congress of the United States (Committee memberships Armed Services, Homeland Security, Foreign Affairs, 2013- 2021)
  • Candidate for the US Presidency (2020)
  • Lieutenant Colonel, Civil Affairs officer in the U.S. Army Reserves (present)


“I can no longer remain in today’s Democratic Party,” Gabbard declared.


In her biographical notes is the affirmation that Tulsi Gabbard 

“Puts country before party; and approaches every issue—domestic and foreign—based on ensuring the safety, security, and freedom of the American people.” 

 

[Text minor edited for present composition]

Sources
Biographical Directory of the United States Congress https://bioguide.congress.gov/search/bio/G000571
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tulsi_Gabbard
https://tulsi.substack.com/about

Gabbard, Tulsi, “Why I’m leaving the Democratic Party,” circa October 11, 2022 https://tulsi.substack.com/

 

B

rings to Mind a Great American Moment

Separation and Cause (An excerpt)

“[W]hen a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce [the people] under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.”

Cause (charges)

“He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.”

“He has dissolved Representative Houses, repeatedly, for opposing … his invasions on the rights of the people.”

“He has refused for a long time … to cause others to be elected… (thus exposing the State) to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.”

“He has obstructed the Administration of Justice, by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary powers.”

“He has made judges dependent on his Will alone….”

“He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harass our people, and eat out their substance.”

“He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies, without the Consent of our legislatures.”

“He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the (Civilian) power.”

“He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation.”

From the top

“When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.”

“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all … are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.

“That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.”

“That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect (to secure, bring about) their Safety and Happiness.” (Emphasis and synonyms added)
Except from one of our greatest documents: Declaration of Independence
In Congress, July 4, 1776: “The Unanimous Declaration of the Thirteen United States of America” 

 

T

HINK!

Think of destructionist and tyranny in contexts other than ancient and not so ancient Colonialism. 

Think of tyranny personified in a two-headed political party and worse a singular domineering party. And ask what ought I to do?

What is my citizenry duty? In contemporary times with so many technological gadgets and platforms, and communications enablers—How do I call our nation to Unity? Break the bonds of tyranny? Demand law, discipline, and order among the higher echelon as well as among the masses?

Blame and complain will change nothing.

How do we establish and insist on participation of multiple political parties, dissent, debate, and independent thought and action (together with respectfulness and proper civility), and no-money (no-greased palms)-required access to public forums, discussion and debate, and candidacy and place on the ballot?

How do we dissolve or disband the incestuous cabal, the tactics, and the instruments of tyranny? How do we work to reestablish and improve Conscience and the Union of the United States of America?



Composition and Commentary excluding quoted material and individual images
Copyright © Carolyn LaDelle Bennett
Author’s links
www.BennettsAmericanEpitaph.com
https://www.facebook.com/carolynladelle.bennett
https://insightbeyondtodaysnews.blogspot.com/
nolandanisland@hotmail.com




Monday, August 17, 2020

Shame and Show: Patrick Martin, Joseph Kishore examine

Joseph Biden (Democratic Party) vice presidential choice of Kamala Harris
 

Joseph Biden (Democratic Party) vice presidential choice of Kamala Harris


F


og

Failure of choice:
Failure of even Pretense of Democracy
 
Kishore
“This says everything about the degraded state of American politics.

In the midst of monumental political, economic and social crises, and against the backdrop of so much suffering, the American people are to be offered the ‘choice’ between the fascistic Trump, the conman from New York, and a Democratic Party ticket headed by a corporate shill from Delaware and an ex-prosecutor from California.

 Status Quo now and forever

Martin
The [Biden selection of Harris] decision was entirely predictable and widely expected in its reaffirmation of “the right-wing political orientation of the Democratic Party presidential ticket.

Biden has a 48-year political career in which he has been identified primarily with intensified police repression at home and the ferocious defense of the interests of American imperialism abroad.

The 77-year-old candidate is joined by a 55-year-old running mate with her own right-wing credentials: as a law-and-order prosecutor and attorney general in California, and, since coming to Washington in 2016, an advocate and defender of the military-intelligence apparatus.

Neither Harris nor Biden is associated with any popular social movement or linked to the advocacy of any significant social or political reform.

Biden and Harris have carried out their entire political careers under conditions where the Democratic Party has been moving steadily, and ever more rapidly, to the right. 

S

uperficiality, Ancestral Irrelevancy

Fraud, Show, Insult
Planned Incompetence and Broken Promises
Opportunism
Inevitable Weakness of Mind, Character, Service

Kishore
There is something incredibly degrading and shameful about the whole process, testifying to the intellectual and cultural collapse of American politics.

The ‘historic’ character of the Harris nomination is premised entirely on her race and gender. She would be the “first African-American vice president,” the “first Asian-American vice president” and the “first female vice president.” She already is the “first Black woman on the national ticket of the Democrats or Republicans.” Everything is about the symbolism involved in the choice of Harris, with not a word about the program of a Democratic Party administration.

Those invested in the racialist campaign have jumped on the bandwagon to declare the selection of Harris ‘historic’” However, “despite the hosannas from the advocates of identity politics”; Harris’ ethnicity and gender provide no assurance of a character or commitment to ‘progressive’ politics.

Racialists conveniently forget their messiah, Barack Obama, who, in Martin’s words

“…proved to be a thoroughly reactionary defender of Wall Street and the CIA; bailed out big banks and the stock exchange; forced auto workers to take wage cuts, continued the wars of George W. Bush and added new ones, including Libya, Syria and Yemen.” 

Objectively speaking, there is little to distinguish Harris, with only four years in the US Senate, from other potential alternatives for the vice presidency. She is not notably more qualified than dozens of other senators, governors or representatives.

But in the eyes of the advocates of identity politics, in and out of the corporate media, Harris’s mediocrity and right-wing politics count for nothing compared to her skin color and gender.

“In terms of her politics, there is clearly nothing ‘historic’ about Harris,” Kishore writes.

“In her unbounded opportunism and ruthless pursuit of her own career and economic interests,” Martin writes, Harris personifies both the social psychology and class basis of identity politics…, the politics of privileged layers of the upper-middle class—including but not limited to minorities— 

… that use race, gender and sexual orientation to conceal the fundamental class divisions in capitalist society; channel social opposition behind the Democratic Party; and carve out a greater share of the wealth of the top one percent for themselves. It is organically hostile to the interests of the working class and socialism.

“The selection of [Kamala] Harris,” Kishore says, “exposes the utterly reactionary character of politics that bases itself on race, gender and other forms of identity—anything but class. 

Democrats’ response to protests against police violence obscured class issues; promoted racial divisions, and propagated “the lie that the violence of the police is an expression of the oppression of ‘black America’ by ‘white America.’” 

T

he outcome of this racialist campaign is their vice-presidential candidacy selection “of a right-wing ex-prosecutor who once covered up evidence to keep an innocent man on death row and worked to tear immigrant children from their parents.”




Sources

Martin, Patrick. “Biden picks former law-and-order prosecutor Kamala Harris to be his Democratic running mate”  August 12, 2020 https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2020/08/12/harr-a12.html

Kishore, Joseph. “The selection of Kamala Harris and the degradation of American politics”  [Joseph Kishore is SEP candidate for US president] August 13, 2020 https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2020/08/13/pers-a13.html

 

Insight Beyond Today’s News, CLB - © All Rights Reserved

 

 

 




Long Way from Madison—Time to Rethink, Revise

Qualifications Standards Enforcement  Prerequisites for Public Office We are a long way—carelessly and arrogantly distanced— from Madison, ...