Showing posts with label World Socialist Web Site. Show all posts
Showing posts with label World Socialist Web Site. Show all posts

Sunday, March 1, 2020

Dishonesty Pays, Honesty gets the Boot


Entertainment Company Removes Hard News Reporter

In a casual bar setting, representatives of a group falsely represent themselves as documentary makers and fail to “secure consent” of conversationalists in a personal exchange; then release their secretly recorded video of the exchange. Blindsided by the secret recording was veteran reporter David Wright. On release of the video, Disney’s ABC deciders censor, suspend, and remove from his beat a reporter who, by all accounts, appears to have honestly earned his stripes.

Vault describes the Walt Disney Company as “the world’s largest media conglomerate with assets encompassing movies, television, publishing, and theme parks.” Its TV holdings include the “ABC TV network and almost ten TV stations, as well as a portfolio of cable networks including ABC Family, Disney Channel, and ESPN (80 percent-owned).” Disney “produces films through the Disney, Pixar, Marvel Entertainment, and Lucasfilm brands. The corporation’s Disney Parks and Resorts run popular theme parks such as ‘Disney World’ and ‘Disneyland.’

In 2019, Disney purchased assets of Twenty-First Century Fox for $71.3 billion making it an even greater media and entertainment behemoth.

Personal ideology, fear and jealousy mixed with ignorance on the one hand; and concentrated and inordinate power and its overreach and abuse on the other — usually conspire to undermine all that is “good”: good people, good work, good professionals. 

A
 Brief Outline of veteran journalist David Wright’s work  

  • 2002- : beginning with UN weapons inspections prior to 2002 U.S. invasion of Iraq
  • 2003: shared News & Documentary Emmy Award for his reporting from Baghdad and Fallujah
  • 2003 (circa)-2005: covered the Holy See and the Roman Catholic Church since the final years of Pope John Paul II.
  • 2004: awarded Emmy David Kaplan Award from the Overseas Press Club for his reporting from Darfur region of Sudan
  • 2006: shared with ABC News team Alfred I. du Pont (Columbia University) Award.
  • 2008: covered then Democratic Senator Barack Obama’s historic bid for the Democratic nomination and during the general election covered Republican Senator John McCain
  • 2013: covered resignation of Pope Benedict XVI and the conclave that ended with the election of Pope Francis
  • 2015: Nominated for Emmy Award for his “Nightline” reports on sexual assault allegations against yoga guru Bikram Choudhury
  • 2016: Lead political reporter (for Nightline) during Presidential campaign from New Hampshire through transition of leadership
Wright’s extensive travels (reporting) include: “multiple trips with Popes Benedict and Francis in Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and the Americas” including  Pope Francis’s historic trip to Ireland where the pope tried “to atone for the clerical sexual abuse crisis”; and Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò’s testimony that led to calls for the resignation of Pope Francis.

Wright’s documented travels also include wildlife reporting on Giant Pandas in China, Spirit bears in British Columbia, polar bears in Hudson’s Bay (or Hudson Bay, large saltwater body in Northeastern Canada) and mountain gorillas in Congo. His work brought “in depth reporting on wildlife and conservation efforts around the world.”

His early career and later years in public broadcasting: WBFO-FM Buffalo, WBUR-FM Boston reporter; KQED-FM San Francisco host of statewide broadcast “The California Report”; and frequent contributor to NPR nationally; substitute hosting on Southern California Public Radio’s “Madeleine Brand Show”, NPR’s “On Point” and “All Things Considered-Weekend edition” His television work over the years has included appearances on “Nightline,” “World News Tonight,” “Good Morning America” and “20/20.”

Wright signed on with ABC News in 2000; over the years he has reported from bureaus in major cities — from London, England, to the District of Columbia.

On February 26, 2020, the ABC News management censored and suspended Wright and pushed him out of their political news reporting and programming.

E
ntertainment Owner of ABC “News”
Walt Disney Company
Total assets: $193.984 billion (2019)
Revenue: $69.570 billion (2019)

Walt Disney Television
Broadcast and cable television, mass media industry
Names before Disney’s March 20, 2019, acquisition of 21st Century Fox:
“Disney–ABC Television Group,” “ABC Group”; “Capital Cities/ABC”

Parent: Disney Media Networks, overseer of “television assets owned and operated by The Walt Disney Company”
Disney Media Networks’ Primary subsidiaries: ESPN and Walt Disney Television
Division management of: “Disney’s 50 percent equity stake in A&E Networks”
Divisions: ABC News; ABC Owned Television Stations
Subsidiaries: Disney Television Studios, American Broadcasting Company, Disney Channels, Worldwide (US channels), ABC ‘Family’ Worldwide; FX Networks, National Geographic Networks (73%)
Group assets: ABC network; cable networks: Freeform, Disney Channels, FX and National Geographic channels; Disney Television Studios: ABC Studios, 20th Century Fox Television and Fox 21 Television Studios; ABC News; and ABC Owned Television Stations.

ABCN: ABC News
Parent: Walt Disney Television (Disney Media Networks)
Division of: American Broadcasting Company
Headquarters: Upper West Side Manhattan, 77 West 66th Street, Times Square, NYC
Entertainment Fare: “ABC World News Tonight”; other programming “Good Morning America,” “Nightline,” “Primetime,” “20/20,” “This Week”

ABC: American Broadcasting Company
American Broadcasting Company: commercial radio and television
Owner: The Walt Disney Company (Disney Media Networks division)
Headquarters: Directly across the street from Walt Disney Studios / adjacent to the Roy E. Disney Animation Building on Riverside Drive in Burbank, California


M
atthew Taylor ends his article with this observation.
ABC’s decision to suspend (David) Wright for discussing his personal political views in a private conversation illegally recorded by a known right-wing provocateur” — reflects a “…growing fear among the ruling class” that ideas socialist in nature or appearing to be “are starting to take hold among the masses.”


Sources

Established in 1996, Vault’s main occupation is producing “rankings, ratings, and reviews on thousands of top employers and hundreds of internship programs,” which are “regularly featured and cited by” major U.S. general news and finance media outlets.
Vault “American Broadcasting Companies Inc” 2020 https://www.vault.com/company-profiles/media-entertainment/american-broadcasting-companies-inc

WSWS “ABC News suspends veteran reporter who called himself a socialist, criticized network in secret recording” by Matthew Taylor February 28, 2020 https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2020/02/28/news-f28.html

Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Wright_(journalist)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Walt_Disney_Company
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walt_Disney_Television
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Broadcasting_Company
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ABC_News

Insight Beyond Today’s News, CLB - © All Rights Reserved

Sunday, November 24, 2019

Designed to Distract, Divide, Yoke, and Disempower — Beware Charlatans’ Coloring of History


The Times of New York — a rag that contributed to the slaughter, maiming and birth defects of millions of Iraqis and millions more in U.S. aggression across the Middle East — has published and distributed to impressionable school children a pack of lies, twisted facts, and self-serving drivel drafted by sycophantic messengers. And it needs to be countered.

 

A

uthentic Repository
Valley City, North Dakota-born James M. “Jim” McPherson is an American Civil War historian, and is the George Henry Davis ‘86 Professor Emeritus of United States History at Princeton University. His Bachelor of Arts was taken at Gustavus Adolphus College (St. Peter, Minnesota) and his PhD at Johns Hopkins University. His major awards include the Pulitzer Prize, Lincoln Prize, and Pritzker Military Library Literature Award.

His major published works include The Struggle for Equality; Battle Cry of Freedom; Abraham Lincoln and the Second American Revolution; For Cause and Comrades: Why Men Fought in the Civil War; Crossroads of Freedom: Antietam 1862; Fields of Fury: a history of the American Civil War for children; This Mighty Scourge.
Attributed
“There are all kinds of myths that a people has about itself, some positive, some negative, some healthy and some not healthy. I think that one job of the historian is to try to cut through some of those myths and get closer to some kind of reality. So that people can face their current situation realistically, rather than mythically. I guess that's my sense of what a historian ought to do”— James M. McPherson, An exchange with a Civil War historian
Cutting through Deliberate Misinformation
S
ober Well-informed thoughts Worthy of Pondering
Professor James McPherson in interview with World Socialist Web Site on “Project 1619”
The account is
  • Disturbingly narrow;
  • “Unbalanced, one-sided,” and
  • Lacking in “context and perspective on the complexity of slavery, which (any serious student of history knows) was clearly (and) obviously not an exclusively American institution.”
Question: “You are one of the leading historians of the Civil War and slavery” and “the Times did not approach you?”
Professor McPherson: No, they didn’t. (Emphasis added)
A

uthoritative sources uninvited
WSWS: We’ve spoken to a lot of historians, leading scholars in the fields of slavery, the Civil War, the American Revolution, and we’re finding that none of them were approached. Although the Times doesn’t list its sources, what do you think, in terms of scholarship, this 1619 Project is basing itself on?
Professor McPherson: I don’t really know. One of the people they approached is Kevin Kruse, who wrote about Atlanta. He’s a colleague, a professor here at Princeton. He doesn’t quite fit the mold of the other writers. But I don’t know who advised them, and what motivated them to choose the people they did choose.
Dubious DNA charge: Project 1619’s leader and lead writer anchors the tome on the thesis that “anti-black racism runs in the very DNA of this country” (America).
Professor McPherson: It does not make very much sense to me.[Emphasis added]
I suppose she’s using DNA metaphorically. She argues that racism is the central theme of American history. It is certainly part of the history. But again, I think it lacks context, lacks perspective on the entire course of slavery and how slavery began and how slavery in the United States was hardly unique. And racial convictions, or “anti-other” convictions, have been central to many societies.
“But the idea that racism is a permanent condition …, that’s just not true. And it also doesn’t account for the countervailing tendencies in American history as well— because opposition to slavery, and opposition to racism, has also been an important theme in American history.”
R

oots in America’s First Revolution
Abolitionists “viewed the Declaration of Independence as sacred scripture…
Professor McPherson: So did Lincoln. It was basic to the Republican Party. [emphasis added]
Professor McPherson: The American Revolution was first and foremost a war for independence. But there was also a more social dimension to the American Revolution, and a movement toward greater democracy, though they didn’t like to use that term. And it coincided with, and partially caused, the abolition of slavery in half of the states, the northern states, as well as a manumission movement among Virginia slaveholders.
It was not a revolution in the sense of the French Revolution, which followed it by a decade, or the Soviet Revolution of 1917, but that doesn’t mean it didn’t accomplish anything.
The accomplishments were more political than social and economic, but nevertheless there were some social and economic dimensions — progressive dimensions, I would say.
Out of the Revolution came an anti-slavery ethos, which never disappeared, even though the period from the 1790s to the 1830s was a quiet period in the antislavery movement—though there was the Missouri Compromise of 1820.
Nevertheless, the anti-slavery ethos that did come out of the Revolution was a subterranean movement that erupted in the 1830s and shaped American political discourse.
A

bolition, Abolitionists 1700s on
Professor McPherson:  From the Quakers in the 18th century, on through the abolitionists in the antebellum, to the radical Republicans in the Civil War and Reconstruction, to the NAACP which was an interracial organization founded in 1909, down through the Civil Rights movement in the 1950s and 1960s — there have been a lot of whites who have fought against slavery and racial discrimination, and against racism. This has been true “almost from the beginning of American history.” And this is what is “missing from this [Project 1619] perspective.”
Slaveholders, Non-slaveholders
Professor McPherson: In the parts of the South where slavery was a minimal factor—in the Appalachian Mountain chain; for example in western Virginia and in eastern Tennessee where there are very few slaves and very few slaveholders, a lot of the whites did not want to fight for the Confederacy, to risk their lives for what they saw as a slaveholders’ war.
There were “strong currents of unionism in those parts of the South. In fact, West Virginia becomes a union state—one-third of the state of Virginia—in the Civil War.
A

 Counterrevolution
Professor McPherson on “counterrevolution of 1861”: The slaveholders saw the triumph of the Republicans in 1860 as a potential revolution that would abolish slavery. That’s how the Republicans got votes in 1860. They saw Abraham Lincoln and his Republican Party as just as bad as the abolitionists.
[Throughout the 1850s and through their domination of the Democratic Party …, slaveholders in the United States controlled the government. … In fact, the principal reason for secession in 1861 was their loss of control of the United States government, for the first time ever.]

“In order to preempt (the) revolution that would have overthrown slavery in the South, they (slaveholders) undertook … a ‘preemptive counterrevolution,’ which was secession.
“But secession, ironically, brought on the very revolution that it attempted to preempt, through the war: the abolition of slavery.”

T

he War
Professor McPherson: “while the official motivation was preservation of the Union; that increasingly became merged with the destruction of slavery, which had launched the attack on the flag in the first place. (You cannot) really separate those two motives.
While the emphasis originally was on fighting for the Union, fighting for the United States, fighting to defend the flag, increasingly that became bound up with a conviction that the only way the North was going to win the war, preserve the Union, and prevent further, future rebellions against the Union, was to destroy slavery, which had brought the war on in the first place.
Professor McPherson: The Civil War accomplished three things.
  • First, it preserved the United States as one nation.
  • Second, it abolished the institution of slavery. Those two were, in effect, permanent achievements. The United States is still a single nation. Slavery doesn’t exist anymore.
  • Third …, the Civil War accomplished “a potential, and partial, transformation, in the status of the freed slaves, who with the 14th and 15th amendments achieved, on paper at least, civil and political equality.
…The struggle ever since 1870, when the 15th amendment was ratified, has been how to transform this achievement on paper into real achievement in the society.”

L

incoln and Emancipation
Professor McPherson: Lincoln became increasingly convinced, as many of the Union soldiers did, that the Union could not be preserved if that disturbing factor—slavery—remained.
By the summer of 1862 Lincoln had become convinced … that he could never achieve his primary goal—the preservation of the Union—without getting rid of slavery. And this was the first step toward doing that.
“He had already drafted the Emancipation Proclamation, and he was preparing the way for it. …”
In what turned out to be Lincoln’s final speech, “he came out in favor of qualified suffrage for freed slaves, those who could pass a literacy test and those who were veterans of the Union army.”

Knowledge will forever govern ignorance; and a people who mean to be their own governors must arm themselves with the power which knowledge gives.”
attributed to
“Father of the Constitution” (for his critical role in drafting and promotion the U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights)
Co-author of “The Federalist Papers”
Co-founder of the Democratic-Republican Party
Fifth United States Secretary of State (1801-1809)
Fourth President of the United States
James Madison Jr.
(Virginia Democratic-Republican, 1809–1817)



Sources

Wikipedia
James M. McPherson https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_M._McPherson

World Socialist Web Site “Opposition to slavery has also been an important theme in American history”: An interview with historian James McPherson on the New York Times’ 1619 Project
By Tom Mackaman November 14, 2019: The World Socialist Web Site spoke with James McPherson, professor emeritus of history at Princeton University, on the New York Times’ 1619 Project. McPherson is the author of dozens of books and articles, including the Pulitzer Prize-winning Battle Cry of Freedom, widely regarded as the authoritative account of the Civil War. https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2019/11/14/mcph-n14.html

James Madison https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Madison
Brainy Quote https://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/james_madison_135446




Insight Beyond Today’s News, CLB - © All Rights Reserved




Long Way from Madison—Time to Rethink, Revise

Qualifications Standards Enforcement  Prerequisites for Public Office We are a long way—carelessly and arrogantly distanced— from Madison, ...